by jimwalton » Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:03 pm
The idea of Lucifer being cast out of heaven comes primarily from a particular (and errant) interpretation of Isa. 14.12. Isaiah 14 is about the king of Babylon, who was an arrogant son of a gun. Despite widespread support through church history that this is talking about Satan, there is a lot to be said against this interpretation. The position can't be sustained with any close scrutiny. It reads WAY too much into the text. The term "Lucifer" itself comes from a Greek translation of it, as well as the Latin Vulgate *luciferos* ("shining one", i.e., Venus). As a matter of fact, the Old Testament nowhere portrays Satan as a fallen being.
But regardless that Isaiah 14 isn't talking about Satan, your question still stands: How is it possible that a spiritual being in a perfect and sinless place can conjure up sin?
The character we call Satan, and all our understandings of him, don't really congeal until Jesus is on the scene in the NT. The New Testament says nothing of his origins or of his fall. His existence, according to the NT, is indisputable, as well as his evil nature, and that he is a being who possesses a free will. As such we're left to deduce that God created him good (since Genesis says everything God made was good), and that he used his free will to rebel. Despite that it was a sinless environment, any being that is not God is not perfect, and by that I mean beyond the capability of wrong. Free will isn't free if one is restricted from half of the choices. I can hold a perfect piece of hand-cut crystal in my hand. Its perfection doesn't guarantee that it's unbreakable, and it's not the fault of the creator of it that it's breakable; it's the nature of glass. But we aren't told where Satan came from or what happened to him to make him the way he is. We're left to surmise.