by jimwalton » Sun Mar 25, 2018 6:45 pm
> "If God claims that he responsible for the good actions people perform, then why is he not responsible for the evil actions?"
Let's start here. I don't think there's any warrant for saying God is responsible for our good actions. We have free will. He shows us what the good is, he invites us to do it, and he instructs us that doing the good is the better choice, but he is not responsible for the good actions people perform. We have free will to choose the good or the bad, the right or the wrong. If we were unable to choose the bad but were forced to choose only among the good options, that's not really free will. But the reverse is also true: if we couldn't freely have just as much option to choose the good by ourselves, that wouldn't be free will either.
God is responsible for instructing us in what is good, and he certainly has options to bless, test, discipline, or judge, but he is not responsible for the good actions we do. We are free agents.
> since he created in us with a capacity to good... which begs the question: who gave us the capacity to do evil?
Let me put it this way. God is uncreated, by definition. Anything created, therefore, is not God and is less than God. God is righteous and perfect, by definition. Anything created, therefore, has the capacity for unrighteousness and imperfection. In other words, our free will can go in both directions, while God's can't. Righteousness is His nature, not ours.
Therefore the option to do evil is intrinsic to our nature as being not-God. We have that capacity by requirement, since only God is righteous by nature.
Feel free to talk more.